wp_footer()

Featured Posts

Guest Post/Bloggers WantedGuest Post/Bloggers Wanted Hey everyone.  The time has come to open Today's Hot Topic up to some talented writers.  Do you like to write?  Do you like to spread your love for on a particular topic?  Well be a guest poster! ...

Readmore

Country Profile of HaitiCountry Profile of Haiti Haiti became the world's first black-led republic and the first independent Caribbean state when it threw off French colonial control and slavery in a series of wars in the early 19th century. However,...

Readmore

Haiti: How to help the countryHaiti: How to help the country International charities are appealing for donations to help Haiti. In the UK the DEC - an umbrella group which launches and co-ordinates responses to major disasters overseas - has launched a Haiti...

Readmore

Help to Haiti after the earthquakeHelp to Haiti after the earthquake International efforts to help Haiti in the wake of the 7.0 magnitude earthquake are under way, as governments around the world and aid agencies mobilise search and rescue teams and aid supplies. Although...

Readmore

Today’s Talk Rss

Iran’s pursuit for nuclear technology

Posted by CD | Posted in International Politics, Middle Eastern Affairs | Posted on 12-28-2006 | No Comments »

I believe that title is a bit misleading. They are really not pursuing nuclear technology because they already have it. They are in the mist of developing it for what the U.S. would call “a pursuit for nuclear weapons.” Is this just another scare tactic that the Bush administration is using? If you actually take a look at international law and what the IAEA has found, it is the complete opposite of what the Bush administration is saying.

First, the IAEA has found that there is no indication that Iran has diverted nuclear material for military purposes. To this day, there are still IAEA inspectors in Iran. Secondly, Iran’s development of uranium for civilian purposes is allowed under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. So, we have the major watchdog of nuclear technology saying they are not developing it for military purposes and we have a basis under international law that states they can have nuclear technology for civilian purposes. However, we know from Mr. Bush’s past history that his regard for international law and reports from credible international organizations are often thrown away.

The unanimous vote of imposing UNSC1737 is an interesting vote. Considering that a similar vote (UNSC 1696) in late July failed to have all members of the security counsel vote with a single voice.

What are your thoughts? Could Russia and/or China have had a change of heart as I believe their stakes are high in Iran’s situation.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Write a comment